"With a Weak Faith and a Fearful Heart"
Excerpt from the book, THE EVERLASTING RIGHTEOUSNESS

    With a weak faith and a fearful heart many a sinner stands before the altar.  but it is not the strength of his faith, but the perfection of the sacrifice, that saves; and no feebleness of faith, no dimness of eye, no trembling of hand, can change the efficacy of our burnt-offering.  The vigor of our faith can add nothing to it, nor can the poverty of it take anything from it.  Faith, in all its degrees, still reads the inscription, "The blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanseth us from all sin;" and if at times the eye is so dim that it cannot read these words, through blinding tears or bewildering mist, faith rests itself on the certain knowledge of the fact that the inscription is still there, or at least that the blood itself (of which these words remind us) remains, in all its power and suitableness, upon the altar unchanged and uneffaced.  God says that the believing man is justified: who are we, then, that we should say, "We believe but we do not know whether we are justified?"  What God has joined together, let not man put asunder. 
    The question as to the right way of believing is that which puzzles many, and engrosses all their anxiety, to the exclusion of the far greater questions as to the person and work of Him who is the object of their believing.  Thus their thoughts run in a self-righteous direction, and are occupied, not with what Christ has done, but with what they have yet to do, to get themselves connected to His work.
    What should we have said to the Israelite, who, on bringing his lamb to the tabernacle, should puzzle himself with questions as to the right mode of laying his hands on the head of the victim, and should refuse to take any comfort from the sacrifice, because he was not sure whether he had laid them aright; -on the proper place, in the right direction, with adequate pressure, or in the best attitude?  Should we not have told him that his own actings concerning the lamb were not the lamb, and yet that he was speaking as if they were?  Should we not have told him that the lamb was everything, his touch nothing, as to virtue or merit or recommendation?  Should we not have told him to be of good cheer; not because he had laid his hands on the victim in the most approved  fashion, but because they had touched the victim, however lightly and imperfectly, and thereby said, Let this lamb stand for me, answer for me, die for me?  The touching had no virtue in itself, and therefore the excellency of the act was no question to come up at all: it simply intimated the man's desire that this sacrifice should be taken instead of himself, as God's appointed way of pardon; it was simply the indication of his consent to God's way of saving him, by the substitution of another.  The point for him to settle was not, Was my touch right or wrong, light or heavy?  but, Was it the touch of the right lamb, -the lamb appointed by God for the taking away of sin?
    The quality or quantity of faith is not the main question for the sinner.  That which he needs to know is that Jesus died and was buried, and rose again, according to the Scriptures.  this knowledge is life everlasting.